Protocol 35 does not limit the effects of existing internal rules, which provide for the direct effect and primacy of international conventions. Here you will find the text of the agreement between the EFTA states on the creation of a Supervisory Authority and a Court of Justice, as well as its annexes and protocols. PROTOCOLE 12 on compliance assessment agreements with third countries 2. The terms of this participation are agreed between the parties and the candidate country. This agreement is submitted to all contracting parties for ratification or approval in accordance with their own procedures. 3. The parties are doing everything in their power to reach agreement on the issues relevant to this agreement. The parties agreed to negotiate separate agreements on mutual recognition and protection of spirits, in light of existing bilateral agreements, before 1 July 1993. The plenipotentiaries of the EC Member States and the Community, as well as the plenipotentiaries of the EFTA States, have adopted the joint declarations listed below and attached to this final act: the plenipotentiaries of the EC and Community Member States as well as the plenipotentiaries of the EFTA States have also taken note of the agreement on the functioning of a high-level interim group before the EEA agreement comes into force.
in this last act. They also agreed that the high-level interim group would decide, at the latest as soon as the EEA agreement enters into force, on the certification of the texts of the Community acts covered in the annexes of the EEA agreement, written in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Swedish. With regard to the publication of the EEA information that will be published after the EEA agreement comes into force, I have the honour of summarising the agreement we have reached as follows. 2. All agreements or decisions prohibited under this section are automatically invalidated. If, in such a case, the EEA Joint Committee has not reached an agreement on a solution within six months of the opening of these proceedings, or if the parties to the dispute have not, by then, decided to seek a decision from the European Court of Justice, a contracting party may remedy any imbalances , 2. The decisions of the EEA Council are taken by mutual agreement between the Community on the one hand and the EFTA States on the other. Although these agreements have been defined in separate legal instruments, they are part of the overall balance of the outcome of the negotiations and are essential elements for the adoption of the EEA agreement. 4. Where, notwithstanding the application of the previous paragraph, it is not possible to reach agreement on an amendment to an annex to this agreement, the EEA Joint Committee examines any other possibility of maintaining the proper functioning of this agreement and takes all necessary decisions to that effect, including the possibility of taking note of the equivalence of the legislation.
This decision is taken no later than six months from the date of referral to the EEA Joint Committee or, if that date is later, the date of the relevant EU legislation. 2. Non-compliance agreements resulting from the negotiations under paragraph 1 are subject to ratification or approval by the contracting parties in accordance with their own procedures. on the relationship between the EEA agreement and the existing agreement between the EFTA Court of Justice has jurisdiction over the implementation of this agreement, in accordance with a separate agreement between the EFTA States, including: I have the honour of confirming my agreement on the above provisions.